top of page

66 min

Average non-educational daily phone use by US teenagers during school hours.

JAMA PEDIATRICS & AFTER BABEL

6 weeks

Cumulative instructional and social time lost to screen distraction per school year.

PISA & JAMA PEDIATRICS

39 states

Plus DC require schools to ban or restrict phones, and 114 countries now restrict them.

EDUCATION WEEK & UNESCO GEM REPORT

The impact of unrestricted devices in schools

Academic performance and PISA declines

Teacher burden and lost instructional time

Cyberbullying and digital safety

Analysis of international PISA data across 36 countries links heavy leisure device use during school hours to sharp drops in standardised maths, reading and science scores. Early access to personal devices and social media creates continuous attention fragmentation, which compromises long-term learning trajectories.

Without system-wide physical pouching, educators spend instructional time policing devices, confiscating phones and handling parent pushback. Bell-to-bell policies remove the policing burden entirely and give classroom authority back to teachers.

Unrestricted phone access leads to unauthorised recording of students and staff, viral hallway conflicts and online harassment during class hours. Securing cameras and screens during the day protects student privacy and the climate of the building.

Student loneliness and isolation

Research featured by After Babel highlights that screen exposure at lunch and during passing periods displaces face-to-face interaction, driving unprecedented levels of loneliness at school. Bell-to-bell restriction restores real-world peer bonding.

Lunchrooms and hallways get loud again

When phones are secured bell to bell, communal spaces change. Instead of silent rooms of scrolling teenagers, schools report the return of conversation, laughter, cards and sport during breaks.

Why physical enforcement works

Partial bans and classroom-only rules fail because devices stay accessible in pockets and backpacks. As the Phone-Free Schools Movement sets out, structural bell-to-bell policy backed by a physical lockable pouch is what produces consistent compliance across a whole campus.

Implementing a phone-free policy in your school

Students place their powered-off phones into individual lockable pouches on arrival at homeroom or at designated entry stations. The pouch locks instantly and stays in the student's possession all day, so devices never take up office storage and never become a school liability.

At the final bell, students tap the pouch against magnetic unlocking stations near the building exits. It opens in under two seconds, which keeps dismissal moving.

We provide full implementation support: pouches, unlocking hardware, entry signage, staff briefings and parent communication templates for a rollout that does not land on your teachers.

Designed specifically for

Public middle and high schools setting bell-to-bell standards

Private and independent K–12 academies, day and boarding

Exam halls, standardised testing days and assessment periods

Field trips, outdoor education programmes and overnight school trips

Summer camps, youth leadership retreats and athletic programmes, covered under other rooms

Colleges and universities seeking distraction-free lecture halls, covered on our events page

Which countries have banned phones in schools?

By September 2026, UNESCO counted 114 education systems, 58 percent of countries, with a national ban on phones in schools. Of the 83 countries and jurisdictions we track, 51 have a national ban, 13 have regional or partial bans, 13 rely on national guidance and 6 are considering a law. See every policy in detail.

National bans (51)

Europe: France 2018 (primary/collège); 2026 (lycée) · Italy 2024–2025 · Finland 2025 · Sweden 2026 (Aug) · Denmark 2026 (autumn) · Greece 2024 · Austria 2025 (May) · Portugal 2025 · Hungary 2024 · Latvia 2024; 2026 expanded · Poland 2026 (Sept) · Luxembourg 2025 · Bulgaria 2016; full-day bill 2026 · Slovenia 2025 · Cyprus 2024 · Slovakia 2025 (Jan) · Croatia 2026 · Iceland 2026 (Aug) · Georgia 2026 (Sept) · England 2026 (Sept) · Albania 2018 (tightened 2025) · Turkey 2023 · Romania 2023

Americas: Mexico 2026 (Nov 3) · Brazil 2025 · Chile 2026 (Mar) · Peru 2025 (law); 2026 (rules) · Bolivia 2026 · Ecuador 2025 · Costa Rica 2026 (Feb) · Dominican Republic 2026

Oceania: New Zealand 2024

Asia: China 2021 · South Korea 2026 · Singapore 2026 · Philippines 2026 · Malaysia 2018 · Vietnam 2020 · Bangladesh 2011 · Maldives 2026 · Kazakhstan · Uzbekistan 2012 · Mongolia 2018

Middle East: Israel 2026 · UAE 2025 · Saudi Arabia 2021

Africa: Egypt 2023 · Kenya 2008 · Ghana · Uganda · Rwanda 2018

Regional or partial bans (13)

Belgium (Flemish/French/German communities set own rules) · Spain (All regions restrict at least in primary) · Germany (8 of 16 states have bans) · Switzerland (Canton-level (Nidwalden/Valais/Geneva)) · United States (No federal law; 28 states + DC bell-to-bell) · Canada (Every province restricts phones) · Argentina (Provinces only (Buenos Aires/CABA/Neuquén/Salta)) · Australia (All 8 states/territories ban in govt schools) · India (Delhi HC guidelines; total ban rejected) · Pakistan (Punjab: all schools since Nov 2025) · Thailand (Bangkok's 437 city schools) · Morocco (Classroom-use note; schools set own rules) · Nigeria (State bans (Anambra/Oyo/Benue))

Who is moving toward a ban

National guidance only (13): Netherlands (National agreement with schools; nearly all comply) · Ireland (Primary ban; secondary restrict with pouch funding) · Estonia (Schools must set phone rules) · Lithuania (Schools set own rules under ministry advice) · Norway (2024 national recommendation) · Scotland (June 2026 consultation on legislation) · Wales (Govt rejected national ban Jan 2026) · Northern Ireland (Restrict phones during school day) · Colombia (National guidelines; Bogotá city rules) · El Salvador (Classroom restriction announced; not formally published) · Indonesia (July 2026 circular limits use to supervised learning) · Taiwan (2019 guidance; Aug 2026 law lets schools restrict) · Japan (Phones brought but no in-school use)

Considering a law (6): Serbia (Ombudsman draft law in consultation) · Czech Republic (Govt approved draft bill) · Ukraine (Bill 15105 sent back for revision) · Uruguay (Bill passed lower house Feb 2026) · Panama (Bill 434 passed first debate) · Fiji (Ministry drafting ICT policy (date unclear))

United States: no federal law, but at least 39 states and DC require schools to ban or restrict phones, 28 of them bell to bell. See every state.

Canada: every province now restricts phones, led by Quebec's full-day ban. See every province.

United Kingdom: England's ban is now law, Scotland is consulting on legislation, and Wales and Northern Ireland use guidance. What England's law means.

Whatever your rules require, buy the pouches outright: one price, no subscription or annual licence, shipped to schools in any country, and we beat any written quote. Why buying beats renting.

safety

Addressing parent communication

“How do parents reach their child in an emergency?”

This is the question at every parent forum, and answering it clearly is what builds community alignment.

Our pouches do not block signal. Devices stay connected to the cellular network and keep receiving emergency alerts and incoming notifications while remaining physically inaccessible.

Parents reach their child during the school day through the main administration office, which means the school knows a family emergency is happening rather than finding out later.

Students with documented medical requirements, such as a blood glucose monitor, or with specialised IEP needs, are granted explicit pouch exemptions.

During an evacuation or lockdown, safety protocol relies on teacher direction. A lightweight pouch never hinders student mobility or slows an exit.

Students stay connected to safety systems. They are just disconnected from social media algorithms.

Documented benefits of bell-to-bell phone freedom

Cognitive focus and academic engagement return

Teachers report immediate improvements in eye contact, deep work capacity and sustained attention.

Rebuilt peer relationships and social climate

School leaders consistently highlight the revival of conversation, games and outdoor sport at lunch.

Disciplinary friction disappears

Taking device enforcement away from teachers improves morale and strengthens the teacher-student relationship.

Cyberbullying declines

Without live recording in hallways, incidents and targeted harassment drop sharply.

Student custody, zero school liability

Students keep their locked phone on them all day, which removes lost-device claims.

Equity across the whole school

Clear campus-wide expectations set the same norm for every student.

Frequently asked questions by school leaders

Why is a bell-to-bell policy better than classroom-only restrictions?

+

How does going phone-free affect academic performance?

+

What happens for students with documented medical or IEP needs?

+

Does pouching really remove the enforcement burden from teachers?

+

How fast are arrival and dismissal?

+

How do we get clubs and activities going again at lunch?

+

Can our existing staff run this day to day?

+

Can we order pouches with our school crest?

+

Ready to move your school phone-free?

Give us your student enrolment and the term you want to start, even if it is a year away and still needs a board vote. A person replies within 24 hours with a figure you can put in your budget, and we ship to schools in any country.

Dedicated school support · Custom rollout planning · Pilot programmes available · Worldwide shipping

Name

Work email

Phone

School type

Student headcount

Target term start

 

Not sure what you need yet?

 

bottom of page